The Second Circuit has reinstated a lawsuit challenging New York Labor Law Section 203-e, which prohibits employment discrimination based on reproductive health decisions. Religious organizations argue the law infringes on their First Amendment rights, potentially setting a major legal precedent.
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, a landmark case that could reshape how reverse discrimination claims are evaluated in workplace lawsuits. The case will determine whether majority-group employees (such as white or male workers) must provide additional proof that their employer intended to discriminate against them when filing a workplace discrimination claim. The decision could have major consequences for companies implementing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and hiring practices.
President Trump’s Executive Order 14173 eliminates diversity hiring requirements for federal contractors, reversing key affirmative action policies. While proponents argue it restores merit-based hiring, critics claim it will decrease workplace diversity and limit opportunities for historically marginalized groups. This order could lead to significant legal battles and force companies to reevaluate their DEI initiatives to avoid compliance risks.
This guide explains what to expect during a pregnancy discrimination case, including how to file a claim, the legal process, and potential remedies for discrimination at work.
Workplace discrimination is a significant issue affecting employees in New Jersey, with both federal and state laws offering protections. New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination (LAD) extends beyond federal law, covering additional characteristics such as sexual orientation and gender identity. Discrimination can manifest in hiring, pay disparities, or hostile work environments. Victims of discrimination can file complaints with agencies like the DCR or EEOC, and employers can ensure compliance through training and clear policies to foster an inclusive workplace.