Employment Discrimination

Blog Post Image

McKesson's $448K Back Wage Settlement: Lessons in Fair Hiring Practices

McKesson’s $448,000 back wage settlement underscores the importance of equitable hiring practices, especially for federal contractors bound by anti-discrimination laws. For employers, this case serves as a reminder to prioritize fairness in recruitment, avoid biases, and implement transparent hiring practices. Companies that proactively foster inclusive and compliant hiring processes contribute to a more diverse workforce and minimize the risk of costly settlements and reputational harm.

Read More
Blog Post Image

Apple's $25 Million Settlement: Implications for Hiring Practices and U.S. Workers

Apple has agreed to pay $25 million to settle allegations of hiring discrimination, favoring foreign workers on visas over U.S. citizens, violating federal anti-discrimination laws. The settlement underscores the importance of fair hiring practices and compliance with the Immigration and Nationality Act. It has broader implications for corporate hiring policies, particularly in the tech industry.

Read More
Blog Post Image

EEOC's Fiscal Year 2024 Litigation: A Focus on Emerging Issues and Vulnerable Populations

The EEOC’s 2024 litigation strategy focuses on addressing systemic discrimination, protecting vulnerable populations, and tackling emerging issues like AI bias and workplace harassment. Key areas include protecting marginalized groups such as immigrants, people with disabilities, and LGBTQ+ individuals, as well as enhancing protections for pregnant and caregiving employees. The EEOC is also challenging biased AI algorithms in hiring and ensuring compliance with anti-discrimination laws. Employers must review their hiring practices, harassment prevention policies, and accommodations to align with these priorities, creating a safer and more inclusive workplace.

Read More
Blog Post Image

The Role of Non-Disclosure Agreements in Sexual Harassment Cases: Insights from Recent Settlements

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) are often used in sexual harassment settlements to ensure confidentiality but raise concerns about accountability. While NDAs protect victims' privacy and help resolve cases quickly, they can also shield perpetrators and limit transparency. High-profile cases like Harvey Weinstein and Activision Blizzard show the negative impact of NDAs in perpetuating harassment cultures. Recent legislative changes, like California’s Silenced No More Act and New York’s anti-NDA law, aim to empower victims and increase transparency. Balancing confidentiality and accountability remains a critical issue for employers and lawmakers.

Read More
Blog Post Image

Understanding the Legal Implications of Workplace Relationships: Lessons from the Diddy-Cassie Allegations

Workplace relationships involving power imbalances can lead to significant legal issues, including coercion, harassment, and retaliation. The Diddy-Cassie allegations highlight the challenges of consent when one party holds influence over the other’s career. Companies must implement clear policies and provide support for employees to protect against these risks.

Read More