Insights

The Role of Non-Disclosure Agreements in Sexual Harassment Cases: Insights from Recent Settlements

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) have become a common tool in settling sexual harassment cases, often ensuring that details of the incident and settlement remain confidential. While NDAs provide a level of privacy for both parties, they also raise questions about accountability and transparency, especially in high-profile cases. This article explores the role of NDAs in sexual harassment settlements, examines recent cases, and discusses the delicate balance between confidentiality and accountability in workplace harassment matters.

Understanding Non-Disclosure Agreements in Sexual Harassment Cases

An NDA is a legal contract that prevents one or both parties from disclosing certain information to the public or third parties. In sexual harassment cases, NDAs are often included as part of the settlement, prohibiting the victim from speaking out about the details of the incident or the terms of the agreement.

For companies, NDAs can be a way to avoid reputational damage, while for victims, NDAs may provide a quicker resolution and a sense of closure. However, NDAs can also silence victims, limiting their ability to speak openly and, in some cases, potentially shielding repeat offenders from public scrutiny.

The Pros and Cons of NDAs in Sexual Harassment Cases

NDAs can serve various purposes, but they come with both benefits and drawbacks:

Pros:

Privacy and Discretion for the Victim
Many victims of sexual harassment seek privacy, fearing the stigma or judgment that may come from sharing their experiences publicly. NDAs can protect a victim’s identity and provide control over personal information.
Quicker Resolution
NDAs can lead to faster settlements, allowing both parties to avoid prolonged court battles. Victims may prefer a settlement with an NDA if it helps them move forward without the emotional toll of lengthy litigation.
Reduced Reputational Damage for the Employer
For employers, an NDA helps contain negative publicity and protect the company’s reputation. This can be especially important for high-profile organizations or public figures who are at risk of significant backlash.

Cons:

Limited Accountability for Perpetrators
By keeping details private, NDAs can shield perpetrators from public scrutiny, allowing them to continue working or interacting with others who are unaware of their history. This can be particularly concerning if the individual has a pattern of harassment.
Silencing Victims
NDAs often restrict victims from discussing their experiences, which can be re-traumatizing. Many victims report feeling isolated and unsupported when they cannot speak out or connect with others who have similar experiences.
Lack of Transparency
NDAs prevent public knowledge of the company’s actions and culture, which can perpetuate a workplace environment where harassment is tolerated or ignored. Without transparency, it becomes challenging to assess whether an organization is addressing its internal issues effectively.

High-Profile Cases Involving NDAs in Sexual Harassment Settlements

Recent high-profile cases have brought NDAs into the spotlight, raising questions about their impact on accountability and justice:

The Harvey Weinstein Scandal
The #MeToo movement gained momentum in part because of allegations against Harvey Weinstein, who used NDAs in settlements with multiple women. These agreements kept victims silent, allowing Weinstein’s pattern of abuse to continue for years. This case highlighted how NDAs can protect repeat offenders, leading to legislative changes in some states to limit their use in harassment cases.
Fox News Settlements
In the case of former Fox News CEO Roger Ailes, several women who experienced harassment signed NDAs as part of their settlements. These agreements prevented victims from speaking publicly, which, critics argue, allowed a culture of harassment to persist within the organization. Following these revelations, Fox News faced public backlash, leading to reforms in its workplace policies and increased scrutiny of NDAs in similar cases.
The Activision Blizzard Case
Activision Blizzard faced a lawsuit alleging a “frat boy” culture that included sexual harassment and discrimination. Although some victims initially signed NDAs, public pressure eventually led to more transparent disclosures. The company’s eventual decision to release employees from NDAs in harassment cases showed how public sentiment is shifting toward transparency and accountability.

Recent Legislative Changes on NDAs in Sexual Harassment Cases

Several states have responded to the controversies surrounding NDAs in sexual harassment cases by enacting legislation to limit their use, aiming to increase transparency and protect victims’ rights.

California’s Silenced No More Act
In 2022, California enacted the Silenced No More Act, which prohibits NDAs in settlements for harassment, discrimination, or retaliation claims based on protected characteristics. This law empowers victims to speak freely about their experiences, even if they settle, increasing public awareness of workplace misconduct.
New York’s Anti-NDA Legislation
New York passed a law in 2018 that limits the use of NDAs in sexual harassment settlements. Under this law, NDAs are only enforceable if the victim requests confidentiality. This shift places control back in the hands of the victim and ensures that they have the option to share their experiences if they choose.
Federal Efforts: Speak Out Act
At the federal level, Congress has introduced the Speak Out Act, which aims to limit NDAs in cases of sexual harassment and assault. Although still pending, this bill reflects growing momentum to restrict NDAs that silence victims, creating a national framework for transparency and victim empowerment.

Balancing Confidentiality and Accountability in Sexual Harassment Settlements

As companies and legislators address the impact of NDAs in harassment cases, a central question remains: How do we balance confidentiality with accountability?

Giving Victims a Choice
Allowing victims to decide whether to speak about their experiences is essential. Laws like New York’s, which require victim consent for an NDA, restore control to the individual. This approach respects the victim’s privacy without compromising their right to speak out if they choose.
Transparency Policies for Employers
Organizations can adopt policies that promote transparency, such as regular reporting on harassment claims and outcomes (without disclosing personal information). This allows companies to demonstrate accountability and commitment to a safe workplace, even if NDAs are in place.
Establishing “Sunset Clauses” for NDAs
Some legal experts suggest that NDAs should include “sunset clauses” that allow information to become public after a certain period. This approach provides temporary confidentiality while ensuring that patterns of harassment can eventually be revealed.
Providing Emotional and Legal Support to Victims
NDAs can be overwhelming and confusing, particularly if victims are unaware of their rights. Ensuring that victims have access to legal representation and mental health resources can help them make informed decisions about NDAs, including whether confidentiality is in their best interest.

Steps for Employees Considering an NDA in a Sexual Harassment Settlement

If you are an employee considering signing an NDA as part of a harassment settlement, here are some essential steps to consider:

Consult a Sexual Harassment Attorney
An experienced attorney can explain the implications of an NDA, discuss the potential impacts on your future, and help you negotiate terms. Legal guidance ensures you fully understand your rights and options.
Evaluate the Impact on Your Well-being
Consider whether keeping the details private is beneficial or if it may cause additional stress. If you want to speak out about your experience, discuss this with your attorney to explore possible options.
Request Specific Terms
If you prefer confidentiality but want to retain some freedom, you can request specific terms. For instance, you might negotiate to be able to speak about the incident with close family or future employers.
Understand Any Legal and Financial Implications
Ensure that you understand any legal or financial consequences of breaching the NDA. Some NDAs include significant penalties for violations, which can impact your decision.

Conclusion

The use of NDAs in sexual harassment cases is a complex issue that involves balancing privacy, accountability, and victim empowerment. While NDAs offer certain protections, they can also silence victims and obscure patterns of abuse. As recent high-profile cases and legislative changes have shown, there is a growing push for transparency and reform. Understanding the implications of NDAs and having access to informed legal counsel can help victims make the best choice for their circumstances.

At John J. Zidziunas & Associates, LLC, our employment discrimination lawyers represent employees who have been harmed in New Jersey and Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, Staten Island, Nassau County, or Suffolk County workplaces. For guidance on NDAs in harassment settlements and understanding your rights, call us at (212) 516-1868 or contact us here. We represent workers on a contingency fee basis with free consultations. We also defend employers facing non-legitimate claims.

‍

BACK TO BLOG

If you believe you have a claim that requires legal professional care, please contact our Firm for a free consultation.

Free Consultation