Insights

How HR Can Protect Employees — and Themselves — from Discrimination Lawsuits

Introduction

Human Resources departments are often positioned as both the shield and the sounding board for workplace concerns. But what happens when HR professionals themselves are drawn into discrimination lawsuits—either as defenders of company actions or as plaintiffs alleging retaliation? In 2025, this is no longer a rare scenario. HR is under pressure not only to protect others from harm but to protect themselves from becoming legal collateral.

This post breaks down practical, actionable ways HR can reduce legal risk while actively supporting employees. Drawing from recent legal cases and growing cultural shifts, it explores the delicate balance HR must maintain—and how doing the right thing can also be the legally smart move.

When HR Becomes a Legal Player

Traditionally, HR professionals are viewed as neutral parties tasked with enforcing policy and investigating complaints. But increasingly, they are becoming central figures in discrimination litigation. In several recent lawsuits, HR staff have either:

Been sued for allegedly ignoring or mishandling complaints;
Been named as witnesses to workplace abuse and retaliation;
Or, in a growing trend, filed lawsuits themselves after facing retaliation for advocating on behalf of employees.

A notable example in 2025 involved a former HR business partner at a major Manhattan bank. After informing her manager of her pregnancy, she was placed on a performance improvement plan and ultimately terminated. She filed a lawsuit for pregnancy discrimination, turning her insider knowledge of HR systems into a powerful weapon in court. The case underscores how quickly HR professionals can move from observers to active participants in litigation.

Why This Matters More Than Ever

As laws expand—particularly around pregnancy accommodation, retaliation, and pay equity—employers are under increased scrutiny. At the same time, employees are more informed, more empowered, and more willing to seek legal remedies when internal systems fail them.

For HR, this means doing the bare minimum is no longer sufficient. The focus now must be on proactive risk reduction and clear documentation, without sacrificing compassion or credibility.

5 Ways HR Can Reduce Legal Risk — and Do the Right Thing

1. Document Everything — Objectively and Immediately

Documentation is one of the most powerful tools HR has. It can protect the company when claims are unfounded and protect employees when there’s wrongdoing. But the key is consistency and neutrality.

Every complaint, meeting, performance review, or behavioral concern should be logged factually and with time stamps. Avoid subjective language or emotional framing. In court, vague or inconsistent documentation is often more damaging than none at all.

Example: In a gender discrimination case at a tech startup, HR's failure to log a manager’s repeated comments about a female engineer's “attitude” led to credibility issues when the case went to trial. The jury interpreted the missing records as a sign the company was covering something up.

2. Establish and Enforce Independent Complaint Channels

Employees are unlikely to report discrimination or harassment if they believe their complaint will fall on deaf ears—or worse, make them a target. HR departments must provide secure, anonymous reporting options and make clear that retaliation will not be tolerated.

Independent investigators, third-party ombuds services, and non-management points of contact can build trust and increase the likelihood that misconduct is caught early.

Example: A retail chain avoided a class action lawsuit after an internal hotline caught multiple, unrelated harassment complaints about a store manager. Because reports were centralized and tracked outside the direct chain of command, HR was able to act swiftly and avoid deeper liability.

3. Train Managers and Supervisors—Repeatedly

Frontline managers are often the first to hear about workplace problems—and the first to make them worse. HR must ensure that every manager understands what constitutes harassment, bias, and discrimination, and what to do when they see it.

But more than just annual webinars, training should include real-life scenarios, interactive role-play, and post-training assessments.

Example: In a manufacturing firm recently sued for race-based harassment, a deposition revealed that supervisors hadn’t attended any training in two years. The company claimed to “prioritize inclusion,” but the lack of hands-on training destroyed their credibility in court.

4. Protect the Protectors — Including HR Themselves

HR professionals who advocate for employees must be protected from retaliation, especially when pushing back against leadership. If an HR representative is punished or fired for raising internal concerns, the entire compliance structure falls apart.

Having written policies that shield HR staff from reprisal—and encouraging whistleblower culture within HR itself—ensures that policy enforcement is meaningful, not performative.

Example: A senior HR generalist at a mid-sized finance company filed a wrongful termination suit after being fired for escalating a CEO’s misconduct. Her ability to present internal emails, meeting notes, and policy drafts turned a quiet complaint into a landmark seven-figure settlement.

5. Align Culture With Compliance

Legal protection begins with ethical leadership. If upper management rewards toxic behavior, silences complaints, or plays favorites, no amount of paperwork will save the organization from eventual lawsuits.

HR should have a seat at the leadership table—not just to monitor risk, but to shape culture. Inclusion, equity, and accountability should be part of performance reviews for managers, not just bullet points in a handbook.

Conclusion

In 2025, HR is more than a support function—it’s a front line against discrimination, litigation, and cultural failure. Protecting employees means ensuring they can report wrongdoing safely and be treated fairly. Protecting the company means ensuring that HR operates independently, ethically, and without fear of retaliation.

When HR professionals are empowered to do both, everyone wins—and the lawsuits stay off the front page.

‍

BACK TO BLOG

News

Insights