Insights

When Is an Employer Required to Compensate Employees for Time Spent Dressing for the Job?

Navigating the Legal Landscape: Compensation for Time Spent Dressing in the Workplace

The issue of compensating employees for time spent dressing in their work uniforms, especially when it involves specialized protective gear, has been a subject of legal scrutiny and debate for decades. This matter holds particular importance in industries where safety regulations mandate the use of such gear. While some states have explicitly included these activities under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), others, such as New Jersey, have not made such distinctions, leading to a complex legal landscape that employers and employees must navigate.

‍

A pivotal case in this realm is Steiner v. Mitchell (1956), which established fundamental principles regarding compensation for activities performed before or after regular work shifts. The case ruled that activities like "donning and doffing" specialized protective gear are compensable under the portal-to-portal provisions of the FLSA if they are integral and indispensable to the principal activities for which employees are employed. This landmark decision significantly expanded the scope of compensable work activities under the FLSA, setting a precedent for future cases.

‍

Similarly, in IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez (2005), the Supreme Court of the United States reaffirmed the notion that any activity integral and indispensable to a principal activity is itself a principal activity under the Portal-to-Portal Act. This ruling provided clarity by stating that during a continuous workday, any walking time occurring after the beginning of the employee's first principal activity and before the end of their last principal activity is covered by the FLSA and thus compensable.

However, it's essential to note that neither of these cases defined a specific timeframe for the "donning and doffing" of protective gear. This is because the time spent on such activities was considered to be de minimis, meaning minimal or insignificant, as a matter of law. While the activity itself may be compensable, the actual time spent on it may be so minimal that it does not warrant compensation.

‍

In essence, the Supreme Court's decisions establish that activities like "donning and doffing" of work uniforms or protective gear can be considered compensable under the FLSA if they are integral and indispensable to the employee's principal activities. However, the determination of whether time spent on such activities is de minimis or not may vary depending on the specific circumstances of each case.

‍

Employers must carefully review their policies and practices regarding compensation for "donning and doffing" activities to ensure compliance with federal and state labor laws. It's advisable to seek guidance from legal experts to navigate this intricate area of employment law effectively.

‍

BACK TO BLOG

News

Insights